<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boston Grails Meetup GORM Presentation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://burtbeckwith.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://burtbeckwith.com/blog/?p=169</link>
	<description>Burt Beckwith's Java Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:11:31 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: An Army of Solipsists &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fixing the User/Role Many-to-Many in the Grails Spring Security Plugin</title>
		<link>http://burtbeckwith.com/blog/?p=169&#038;cpage=1#comment-22974</link>
		<dc:creator>An Army of Solipsists &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fixing the User/Role Many-to-Many in the Grails Spring Security Plugin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 05:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burtbeckwith.com/blog/?p=169#comment-22974</guid>
		<description>[...] using the standard GORM mapping approach, i.e. using hasMany and belongsTo. As I pointed out here this is a performance concern when you have a large number of users, since granting a new user a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] using the standard GORM mapping approach, i.e. using hasMany and belongsTo. As I pointed out here this is a performance concern when you have a large number of users, since granting a new user a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Naleid &#187; Batch Import Performance with Grails and MySQL</title>
		<link>http://burtbeckwith.com/blog/?p=169&#038;cpage=1#comment-22052</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Naleid &#187; Batch Import Performance with Grails and MySQL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 06:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burtbeckwith.com/blog/?p=169#comment-22052</guid>
		<description>[...] reading through a couple of very helpful posts by Burt Beckwith, and reading through the Hibernate chapter on batch processing, we have all of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reading through a couple of very helpful posts by Burt Beckwith, and reading through the Hibernate chapter on batch processing, we have all of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Naleid</title>
		<link>http://burtbeckwith.com/blog/?p=169&#038;cpage=1#comment-20654</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Naleid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burtbeckwith.com/blog/?p=169#comment-20654</guid>
		<description>Great post and presentation Burt.  I love seeing what&#039;s going on behind the scenes with the way grails maps belongsTo and hasMany and the performance implications of it.

I always start with using belongsTo and hasMany, but you provide a number of good optimizations that can be used if there are situations where performance does become unacceptable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post and presentation Burt.  I love seeing what&#8217;s going on behind the scenes with the way grails maps belongsTo and hasMany and the performance implications of it.</p>
<p>I always start with using belongsTo and hasMany, but you provide a number of good optimizations that can be used if there are situations where performance does become unacceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burt</title>
		<link>http://burtbeckwith.com/blog/?p=169&#038;cpage=1#comment-20504</link>
		<dc:creator>Burt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burtbeckwith.com/blog/?p=169#comment-20504</guid>
		<description>@Roshan this is an issue with the Spring Security plugin, but changing it would break backwards compatibility. I&#039;m working on a new script that would use the approach that I proposed here, and some documentation to help people migrate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Roshan this is an issue with the Spring Security plugin, but changing it would break backwards compatibility. I&#8217;m working on a new script that would use the approach that I proposed here, and some documentation to help people migrate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roshan Shrestha</title>
		<link>http://burtbeckwith.com/blog/?p=169&#038;cpage=1#comment-20502</link>
		<dc:creator>Roshan Shrestha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burtbeckwith.com/blog/?p=169#comment-20502</guid>
		<description>In your paper, for User and Role, you have removed the collections. Since you maintain the Sprint security plugin, is this solution carried over to the generated User and Role domain classes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In your paper, for User and Role, you have removed the collections. Since you maintain the Sprint security plugin, is this solution carried over to the generated User and Role domain classes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
